Clean Air  

BREDL Letter regarding Corning, Inc. Air Permit

March 7, 2000

Alan Klimek, Director
Division of Air Quality
1641 Mail Service Center
Raleigh, NC 27699-1641

Re: Corning Incorporated, Air Permit Application No. 1300117.99B

Dear Mr. Klimek:

I write to outline our concerns about the nearly completed permit for Corning, Inc. in Cabarrus County.  For several weeks I have been attempting to gather the necessary information to review the application and to feel comfortable that the people who live near the facility are being protected.  I have been unsuccessful to date.

First, we have been unable to get copies of the facility emissions data.  Mr. Jim Southerland has been away and contacted me yesterday to let me know he would be forwarding information and that he would ask the regional offices to provide information.  It is my understanding that Laura Butler had also contacted the regional offices.  I am awaiting the results.

Second, our BREDL technical advisors need time to review the Corning application.  One of our evaluations will compare and contrast the Corning facility with Cardinal Glass.

Third, information in the Corning application is being held confidential.  It is information that we need for our review and that we believe should be provided to the public.

For the above reasons and others, we request the following:

1) DAQ should establish a public comment process with an opportunity for public hearing.  The Corning expansion is large, and the affected public has had no opportunity to have knowledge of the expansion or input into the permit decision.

2) The Corning facility in Cabarrus should not avoid PSD (prevention of significant deterioration).  We believe this decision was made in error.  A full public review is essential for this reason alone.

3) A full determination that methodology for determining emissions can legally be held as confidential information should be justified and explained prior to permit decisions.

4) US EPA must have input into the decision-making about Corning pollution technology and emissions limits.

Two people have contacted me about the permit already granted to Corning in New Hanover. They are considering a challenge to that permit because of the failure to notify the affected public.  The enthusiasm that the NC Department of Commerce has shown for the Corning expansion should not interfere with the rights of affected citizens for a full public participation process.

Thank you in advance for your help in securing needed information and the necessary public review.

Sincerely,

Janet Marsh Zeller
Executive Director


cc: Keith Overcash
 Laura Butler
 Jim Southerland
 Michael Landis

More Info: BREDL Action Alert