Request for Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement on Surplus
Plutonium Disposition and Mixed Oxide Fuel
Fabrication Facility
January 10, 2001
Secretary of Energy Bill Richardson
Forrestal Building
1000 Independence Avenue
Washington, DC 20037
Re: Request for Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement on Surplus Plutonium Disposition and
Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility
Dear Secretary Richardson:
I write on behalf of the Board of Directors of
the Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League, Inc.
to request that you take immediate action to halt
design, construction, and licensing work on the
proposed Mixed Oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication
Facility (MFFF) at the Departments Savannah
River Site in South Carolina. A year ago you
signed the Record of Decision (ROD) for
the Surplus Plutonium Disposition
Environmental Impact Statement (SPDEIS),
which approved the use of surplus military
plutonium as nuclear reactor fuel in commercial
nuclear power plants. Because recent revelations
about this program prove that the document you
signed was based on incomplete and incorrect
information, we ask that you order a Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement before resuming
work on the MFFF.
When you signed the Record of Decision
allowing for the design and construction of this
plutonium fuel factory, the Department claimed
that it could handle and manage the liquid
radioactive wastes generated by plutonium
purification using liquid acid processing--a
necessity for making plutonium fuel. For example,
in response to concerns about the liquid
radioactive waste stream, the Department stated
that no remotely handled transuranic waste would
be created and generation rates for
contaminated liquid waste would generally be
small. (Page 3-972, SPDEIS). Quite frankly,
todays estimates makes the
Departments final analysis--based largely
on the contractors proposal--look like
fiction.
The new numbers prove this and other similar
statements in the Departments analysis to
be untrue.
Instead of generating 680 cubic meters of
transuranic waste today the estimate is 3,200
cubic meters. Instead of 570 gallons of liquid
low level radioactive waste, today the estimate
is 4,280,000 gallons. Without explanation,
facility operations have been extended from 10 to
20 years.
Most notable is the fact that more than one
million gallons of a new liquid radioactive
waste stream at Savannah River Site--called
liquid high alpha activity
waste--will be produced during the
operating life of the plant. At the present time,
the Department and its contractor only have plans
for where to store this waste at the already
filled-to-capacity F-Area Tank Farm at Savannah
River Site. Neither the Department nor the
contractor has a plan for what to do with this
new waste, a clear indication that the plutonium
fuel program is a throwback to the disastrous era
of the produce first, worry later
operations of the Cold War.
The table below illustrates the stark differences
between what the Department predicted in its
final analysis one year ago and the reality
reported in the Environmental Report (ER) for
the Duke Cogema Stone and Webster (DCS) Mixed
Oxide (MOX) Fuel Fabrication Facility
submitted to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
(NRC) on December 20, 2000. These changes are
aggravated by the fact that whereas the
Department claimed ten years of operation, the
contractor is now claiming twenty years of
operation.
Changes
in estimates of annual radioactive waste
generated at MOX Fuel Fabrication Facility
Waste Stream
|
SPDEIS November
1999
|
DCS ER December
2000
|
Liquid High Alpha Activity Waste |
DOE anticipated 130 gallons of
contact-handled transuranic waste |
81,300 gallons |
Liquid Low-level Waste |
57 gallons |
214,000 gallons |
Solid Transuranic Waste |
68 cubic meters |
160 cubic meters |
In essence, this program continues to represent
the worst kind of bait-and-switch. The
Departments estimates reported in the final
SPDEIS were based on earlier estimates from Duke
Cogema Stone and Webster and published by DOE in
the Environmental Synopsis of Proposal for
MOX Fuel Fabrication And Reactor Irradiation
Services in April 1999. Before that, the
Department claimed in its Draft SPDEIS in July
1998 that a plutonium fuel plant would generate
less than 1 gallon of contact-handled TRU waste
and that liquid acid plutonium
processing--quaintly called plutonium oxide
polishing in official reports--was an
unreasonable alternative. In reality,
the Department decided in September 1997 to
abandon its experimental dry
plutonium pyroprocessing scheme it claimed would
work for MOX, but never told the public.
The Department of Energy is obligated under the
National Environmental Policy Act to provide
accurate and complete information before
embarking on projects on federal land. The
Department failed in this fundamental duty. While
we believe this level of misinformation calls for
the Department to abandon the plutonium fuel
program, we will accept as a minimum a
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement to be
completed prior to the expenditure of additional
funds. We at BREDL recognize that you have only a
few days in office; therefore, we urge you to act
now to right this wrong.
We look forward to hearing your reply to this
request.
Respectfully submitted,
Don Moniak
more info: BREDL
Press Release , DOE reply to letter , Insights from
Offsite (No. 2001-1 2/15/01)
|