COMMENTS ON THE SUPPLEMENT
TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT BLUFF MOUNTAIN
TIMBER SALE
BLUE RIDGE ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE LEAGUE
PO Box 88 ~ Glendale Springs, North
Carolina 28629
~ Phone
(336) 982-2691 ~ Fax (336) 982-2954 ~
Email: BREDL@skybest.com
October 2, 1997
USDA Forest Service
PO Box 128
Hot Springs, NC 28743
COMMENTS ON THE SUPPLEMENT TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT
BLUFF MOUNTAIN TIMBER SALE
Compartments 44, 45, and 46 Madison County, North
Carolina
Most of Bluff Mountain has been undisturbed since
the 1930's. It is a recovering ecosystem which is
on the way to becoming a mature habitat. It now
provides the large acreage required by interior
forest birds. Bear populations require the high
quality habitat present on Bluff. The 4,680 foot
peak provides and unbroken region which would be
destroyed by future logging. Long-term habitat
preservation for these species can be assured
only on public lands. Brook trout and other
sensitive species now thrive on the Bluff.
The newspapers recently carried stories about a
landmark agreement on Bluff Mountain between
timber industry, environmentalists, and state
officials. But the proposed new alternative
issued August 29, 1997 will only reduce timber
sale acreage in 1998; the Forest Service's plans
for Bluff do not rule out future timber sales. If
this sale proceeds, new timber harvest objectives
would continue under the existing forest plan.
All harvest methods would be allowed and none
prohibited, including clearcuts. The Supervisor
outlines a minimum of 92 acres to be harvested
for timber in all three compartments on Bluff,
but no maximum. The agreement lists areas to be
dropped from consideration in 1998 but contains
no assurances about 1999 and beyond. And the 1998
schedule for the Bluff timber sale may be
maintained at the expense of thorough
investigation and comparison of the alternatives
including the no-cut option.
On October 29, 1996 Secretary Jonathan Howes of
NC DEHNR recommended that the USFS proceed with
an Environmental Impact Statement for the Bluff
Mountain timber sale. The reduction in timber
volumes outlined in the new preferred alternative
does not address the long-term consequences of
continuing to operate under the existing forest
plan. I understand that revision of the existing
forest plan is two to four years away. If this is
so, Bluff Mountain may be considered for new
timber sales for at least two to four more years.
The environmental impact of 200-300 acres of
timber cutting over four years will have a
cumulative effect similar to the original
one-year sale. The National Environmental Policy
Act prohibits segmenting of large projects into a
series of smaller projects in order to avoid full
compliance with the intent of the law. What are
the US Forest Service's goals for timber
harvesting on Bluff for 1998-2001? What are the
US Forest Service's goals for timber harvesting
on Bluff through 2008? The staged cutting of
Bluff Mountain should undergo a full EIS
The Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League, Inc.
has had a chapter in Madison County for over a
decade. We have worked since that time to
preserve the natural environment, to promote good
stewardship of the land, to protect public
health, and to ensure full public debate. Last
year we petitioned the USFS to put Bluff Mountain
off limits to future logging. We did not
participate in, nor do we concur with the
negotiated recommendations of May 29.
Furthermore, no residents of the community where
logging is proposed were at the table during the
negotiations facilitated by the USFS. The
reductions in public scoping occurring under the
issuance of this Supplement to the EA should not
be allowed in this sale or any subsequent sales.
We recommend the Forest Service should do
the following:
(1) Halt all timber-cutting and road-building in
Compartment 44, 45, and 46 planned for 1998,
(2) Complete a full Environmental Impact
Statement on Bluff before timber sales proceed
including a full scoping process and a complete
inventory of endangered and threatened species.
This would set the stage for rezoning of the
mountain for no cutting when the Forest Plan is
revised, and
(3) Re-zone Bluff Mountain for no logging or road
building.
This mountain is a centerpiece for the future of
this region. Let it return undisturbed to its
natural state. No further logging should occur on
either side of the mountain. Preserve the Bluff
in its entirety. Make an exception for an
exceptional place.
Respectfully submitted,
Louis Zeller
Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League
bluff-ea.com/2-10-97
|